Kalsige.com

Dax Shepard and Jonathan Van Ness engaged in a heated debate on transgender rights and gender-affirming care on the Armchair Expert podcast.

Kalsige.com

Jonathan Van Ness, who is nonbinary, intended to discuss their own projects but ended up focusing on trans rights during the conversation.

Kalsige.com

The debate began with Jonathan suggesting that right-wing beliefs stem from a lack of education, while Dax argued it's a "difference of opinion."

Kalsige.com

They also debated whether the New York Times was more left or right-leaning, with Jonathan contending it leaned right due to its "anti-trans" content.

Kalsige.com

The New York Times had faced criticism from GLAAD for its "inaccurate, biased coverage" of trans issues.

Kalsige.com

Dax expressed concern that disagreeing on one statement would classify him as an "enemy" in the conversation about trans rights.

Kalsige.com

Jonathan clarified that they weren't categorizing Dax as an enemy and encouraged diverse beliefs but noted the importance of not diminishing trans issues.

Kalsige.com

Online reactions to the discussion questioned Dax's role in playing "devil's advocate" and presenting hypothetical, fear-based scenarios.

Kalsige.com

The debate highlighted the complexity of discussing transgender rights and the need for constructive dialogue.

Kalsige.com

The exchange between Dax and Jonathan sparked a broader conversation about the challenges of discussing sensitive topics in the media.